Online communication and collaboration: the key to future education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: In an increasingly digitalized world, online communication and collaboration is not just a tool; it is an essential skill. This competence enables us to connect beyond physical boundaries, breaking down the barriers of the traditional classroom to foster truly global learning. In this study, we explore how online communication and collaboration can transform the educational experience and, more importantly, how it directly impacts students' academic success. Analyze the impact of competence in online communication and collaboration on the motivation, engagement, and academic performance of university students in a digitalized environment. In a setting where interactions are increasingly digital, what role does this skill play in preparing students for the future. Methodology: To answer this question, we conducted a detailed study at a private university with students enrolled in the Global Marketing Management degree program. We used a rigorous approach, based on structural equation modeling (SEM), to uncover the relationships between online communication and collaboration competence (CYC) and academic performance, while also measuring how it affects students' motivation and engagement. Results: The findings were revealing. Online communication and collaboration are not only linked to increased motivation but also enhance student engagement, resulting in better academic outcomes. Online collaboration enables students to interact more fluidly, share ideas, work on projects, and receive instant feedback, which strengthens their learning. This study confirmed that students who feel comfortable collaborating online are more likely to be motivated and perform better in their studies. Discussion: Online communication and collaboration is much more than just a simple skill; it is the key that unlocks the door to success in the digital era. This study underscores the importance of integrating this competence into educational programs to create a richer, more interactive, and effective learning experience. Students who master this skill not only communicate better but also collaborate more productively, resulting in superior academic performance. Conclusions: In summary, the key to a bright educational future lies in fostering digital connection and collaboration, transforming the classroom into a limitless space.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6, Pt.1), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W. y Feather, N. T. (1966). A Theory of Achievement Motivation. Wiley.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. y Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-Efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273
Bubaš, G., Babić, S. y Jadrić, M. (2008). Motivational factors influencing students’ use of online courses: An exploratory analysis. En Proceedings of the Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems - CECiiS 2008 (pp. 149-155). Varaždin: Fakultet organizacije i informatike Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. https://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?yrad=367076
Cenić, D., Petrović, J. y Cenić, S. (2018). The most important motivation factors for knowledge acquisition and successful learning. Facta Universitatis, 2(2) 149-159. https://doi.org/10.22190/futlte1802149c DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUTLTE1802149C
Dweck, C. S. y Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement Motivation. En P. H. Mussen y E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 643-691). Wiley.
Dweck, C. S. y Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256
Farrell, E. y Dweck, C. S. (1985). The role of motivational processes in transfer of learning. Cambridge.
Furrer, C. y Skinner, E. A. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.148
Hartnett, M. (2020). Relationships between online motivation, participation and achievement: More complex than you might think. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.61468/jofdl.v24i1.415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61468/jofdl.v24i1.415
Mehrvarz, M., Heidari, E., Farrokhnia, M. y Noroozi, O. (2021). The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance. Computers y Education, 167, 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
Pérez-Navío, E., Gavín-Chocano, Ó., Checa-Domene, L. y Prieto, M. G. -V. (2023). Relationship between Learning Strategies and Motivation of University Students. Sustainability, 15(4), 3497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043497
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of Goal orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education. The 2006 ELI Annual Meeting: Leading the Revolution. The New Digital Age.
Realyvásquez-Vargas A., Maldonado-Macías A. A., Arredondo-Soto K. C., Baez-Lopez Y., Carrillo-Gutiérrez T., Hernández-Escobedo G. (2020). The Impact of Environmental Factors on Academic Performance of University Students Taking Online Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico. Sustainability, 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219194
Richardson, J. y Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Online Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
Rovai, A. P. y Jordan, H. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Weiner, B. (1974). An Attributional Interpretation of Expectancy-Value Theory. En Cognitive Views of Human Motivation (pp. 51-69). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-741950-3.50008-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-741950-3.50008-2
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.71.1.3
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.92.4.548
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
Weiner, B. (1992). Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories, and research. Sage. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA14309532
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Zhang, Y., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Pinto Llorente, A. M. y Zhao, L. (2021). Digital Competence in Higher Education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability, 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112184