Interaction, dialogue, and new politics. An experimental study in Andalusia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: the term "new politics” encompasses actions aimed at bringing politics closer to citizens, including the use of social media. In this regard, while the anticipated interactivity and two-way communication are widely dismissed considering studies conducted on the sender and the message, it is worth questioning what the public perception is on this matter. In this context, this research seeks to determine whether the public perceives social media as more dialogical compared to other more traditional channels. Specifically, the main objective of the article is to verify whether the medium (a social network or a consolidated print medium) and the ideology of the political sender influence the perception of the message in terms of closeness, interest, and interactivity. Methodology: a quasi-experimental study was conducted with 68 participants from Andalusia, the most populous region in Spain and the first where the far-right party Vox gained parliamentary representation. Results: participants found the message disseminated through social media to be more interactive; however, none of the channels genuinely promoted dialogue, and ideological stance did not influence the evaluation of the message. Discussion: the findings align with the principles of the so-called "new politics," as well as with the real conversational possibilities that social media offers. Conclusions: the discursive practices driven by political leaders and parties on social media continue to follow a one-way communication dynamic, a reality that is accepted by the younger electorate.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
Funding data
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza Centro de Estudios Andaluces
Grant numbers PRY095/19
References
Abuín-Vences, N., & García-Rosales, D.-F. (2023). Populist strategies on Twitter: analysis of the political discourse during the campaign for the general elections in Spain on November 10th, 2019. Communication & Society, 36(4), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.4.175-190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.4.175-190
Alonso-Muñoz, A. (2020) The “More is more” effect: a comparative analysis of the political agenda and the strategy on Twitter of the European populist parties. European Politics and Society, 21(5), 505-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1672921
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2008). T.V. channel changing: Choice, attention, and reception in political communication research. Experiments in Political Science 2008 Conference Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1301769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1301769
Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486
Bekafigo, M. A., & McBride, A. (2013). Who Tweets About Politics? Political Participation of Twitter Users During the 2011 Gubernatorial Elections. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 625-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490405
Bickerton, C. J., & Accetti, C. I. (2021). Technopopulism: The new logic of democratic politics. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807766.001.0001
Blanco, A (2023, July 21). "Perro Sanxe": How Sánchez and the PSOE have turned the meme into an electoral slogan. La Sexta. https://shorturl.at/gjDVX
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947-966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186
Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x
Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 785-794. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01
Carral, U., & Tuñón-Navarro, J. (2020). Estrategia de comunicación organizacional en redes sociales: análisis electoral de la extrema derecha francesa en Twitter.
El Profesional de la Información, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.08
Cebrián Guinovart, E., Vázquez Barrio, T., & Olabarrieta Vallejo, A. (2013). ¿Participación y democracia en los medios sociales? El caso de Twitter en las elecciones vascas de 2012. adComunica, 6, 39-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2013.6.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2013.6.4
CENTRA (2023). Andalusian Barometer of December 2023 [Report]. https://www.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/barometro
Cervi, L., & Marín-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. El Profesional de la Información, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
Congosto, M. L. (2015). Elecciones Europeas 2014: Viralidad de los mensajes en Twitter. REDES, 26(1), 23-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.529
Criado, J. I., Martínez-Fuentes, G., & Silván, A. (2013). Twitter en España: las elecciones municipales españolas de 2011. RIPS, 12(1), 93-113.
Deltell, L., Claes, F., & Osteso, J. M. (2013). Predicción de tendencia política por Twitter: Elecciones Andaluzas 2012. Ámbitos, 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2013.i22.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.mar.05
Díaz, J. B., & del Olmo, F. J. R. (2016). La imagen en Twitter como nuevo eje de la comunicación política. Opción, 32(7), 271-290.
Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Student as experimental participants. A defense of the “narrow data base”. In J.N. Druckman; D. P. Green; K. H. Kuklinsli & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 41-57). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004
Edgerly, S., Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., Thorson, K., & Thorson, E. (2018). New Media, New Relationship to Participation? A Closer Look at Youth News Repertoires and Political Participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 192-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706928
Enli, G., & Moe, H. (2013). Introduction to Special Issue. Social media and election campaigns – key tendencies and ways forward. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 637-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.784795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.784795
Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Twitter and Facebook arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
Fernández Gómez, J. D., Hernández-Santaolalla, V., & Sanz-Marcos, P. (2018). Influencers, personal branding, and political ideology on Twitter. Cuadernos.info, 42, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.42.1348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.42.1348
Fontenla Pedreira, J., Conde Vázquez, E., & Máiz-Bar, C. (2019). Uso de Twitter durante los debates electorales televisados en los comicios andaluces de 2018. Ámbitos, 46, 213-240. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i46.12
Gamir-Ríos, J., Pop, A. I., López-García, G., Llorca-Abad, G., & Fenoll, V. (2022). Unidireccionalidad, promoción partidista y polarización. Actividad en Twitter de los candidatos a la presidencia del Gobierno de España en las elecciones generales de 2019. El Profesional de la Información, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.03
García Ortega, C., & Zugasti Azagra, R. (2014). La campaña virtual en Twitter: análisis de las cuentas de Rajoy y de Rubalcaba en las elecciones generales de 2011. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 299-311. http:// doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45029
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
Gilmore, J., & Howard, P. N. (2014). Digital Media and the 2010 National Elections in Brazil. In B. Grofman, A. H. Trechsel & M. Franklin (Eds), The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective (pp. 43-55). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_4
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & vant´t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
Grant, W. J., Moon, B., & Busby Grant, J. (2010). Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians’ use of the Social Network Tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions, Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497-1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273
Hughes, N. (2011). ‘Young people took to the streets and all of a sudden all of the political parties got old’: The 15M movement in Spain. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614109
Ignazi, P. (2021). The failure of mainstream parties and the impact of new challenger parties in France, Italy and Spain. Italian Political Science Review, 51(1), 100-116. https://doi:10.1017/ipo.2020.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2020.26
INE (2020). Cifras oficiales de población resultante de la revisión del Padrón municipal. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177011&menu=resultados&idp=1254734710990
INE (2022). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares 2022. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176741&menu=resultados&idp=1254735976608#_tabs-1254736194579
Jensen, M. J., & Anstead, N. (2014). Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. In B. Grofman, A. H. Trechsel & M. Franklin (Eds), The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective (pp. 57-81). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5
Jungherr, A. (2016) Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. https.//doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Kam, C. D., Wilking, J. R., & Zechmeister, E.J. (2007). Beyond the “narrow data base”: Another convenience sample for experimental research. Political Behaviour, 29(4), 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9037-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9037-6
Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Smith, A., & Weissmann, D. (2016) The normalization of online campaigning in the web 2.0 era. European Journal of Communication, 31(3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116647236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116647236
Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). The effect of website interactivity on political involvement the moderating role of political cynicism. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000200
Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837
Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894
Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians' Twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0228
Lee, E.-J., Lee, H.-Y., & Choi, S. (2020). Is the message the medium? How politicians’ Twitter blunders affect perceived authenticity of Twitter communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106188
Liberia Vayá, I., Sánchez-Gutiérrez, B., & Hermida, A. (2024). The fallacy of interactivity on Twitter: the case of Andalusian political parties in 2020. Communitacion & Society, 37(1), 167-187. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.1.167-187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.1.167-187
Lilleker, D. G. (2015). Interactivity and branding: Public political communication as a marketing tool. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990841
López Abellán, M. (2012). Twitter como instrumento de comunicación política en campaña: Elecciones Generales de 2011. Cuadernos de Gestión de Información, 2, 69-84.
López-García, G. (2016). “Nuevos” y “viejos” liderazgos: la campaña de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015 en Twitter. Communication & Society, 29(3), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.sp.149-167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.sp.149-167
López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). ¿Qué hacen los políticos en Twitter? Funciones y estrategias comunicativas en la campaña electoral española de 2016. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 795-804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02
López-Rabadán, P., & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.37810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.37810
Lorenzo-Rodríguez, J., & Torcal, M. (2022) Twitter and Affective Polarisation: Following Political Leaders in Spain. South European Society and Politics, 27(1), 97-123, https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2022.2047554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2022.2047554
Lyons, B. A., & Veenstra, A. S. (2016). How (not) to talk on Twitter: Effects of politicians’ tweets on perceptions of the Twitter environment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(1), 8-15. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0319
McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methods in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.091001.170657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.091001.170657
McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., Zubric, S., & Zubric J. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26(6), 743-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936509902600600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006005
McMillan, S. J. (2002a). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media & Society, 4(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480200400208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226370
McMillan, S. J. (2002b). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media (pp. 163-182). Sage DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446206904.n13
Mirer, M. L., & Bode, L. (2015). Tweeting in defeat: How candidates concede and claim victory in 140 characters. New Media & Society, 17(3), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813505364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813505364
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand (2019). Green parties and alternative lists under cross-national perspective. In F. Müller-Rommel (Ed.), New Politics in Western Europe. The Rise and Success of Green Parties and Alternative Lists (pp. 5-19). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429044298-1
Nieland, J. U. (2008). “Politainment”, in W. Donsbach (Ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communicacion. Blackwell Reference Online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp047
Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. Political Science and Politics, 29(3), 474-480. https://doi.org/10.2307/420827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/420827
Painter, D. L. (2015). Online political public relations and trust: Source and interactivity effects in the 2012 US presidential campaign. Public Relations Review, 41(5), 801-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.012
Pallarés-Navarro, S., & Zugasti, R. (2022). Santiago Abascal’s Twitter and Instagram strategy in the 10 November 2019 General Election Campaign: A populist approach to discourse and leadership? Communication & Society, 35(2), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.53-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.53-69
Pedreira, J. F., Vázquez, E. C., & Bar, C. M. (2019). Uso de Twitter durante los debates electorales televisados en los comicios andaluces de 2018. Ámbitos, 46, 213-240. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i46.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i46.12
Pérez Gómez, D. J., & Mahou Lago, X. M. (2020). Participación ciudadana online. Una aproximación a los mecanismos de participación en Andalucía. Fundación Pública Andaluza Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
Pérez-Curiel, C., & García Gordillo, M. (2019). Formato televisivo y proyección en Twitter de las elecciones en Andalucía. In E. Conde-Vázquez, J. Fontenla-Pedreira & J. Rúas-Araújo (Eds.), Debates electorales televisados: del antes al después (pp. 257-282). CAC.
Pineda, A., Bellido-Pérez, E., & Barragán-Romero, A. I. (2022). Backstage moments during the campaign: The interactive use of Instagram by Spanish political leaders. New Media & Society, 24(5), 1133-1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482097239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972390
Rama, J. (2016). Crisis económica y sistemas de partidos. Síntomas de cambio político. Institut de Ciéncies Politique i Socials, WP 344, 1-29.
Ramos Serrano, M., & Selva Ruiz, D. (2005). La comunicación below the line. In J. D. Fernández Gómez (Coord.), Aproximación a la Estructura de la Publicidad (pp. 225-249). Comunicación Social.
Ramos-Serrano, M., Fernández Gómez, J. D., & Pineda, A. (2018). Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections. New Media & Society, 20(1), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730
Said-Hung, E. M., Prati, R. C., & Cancino-Borbón, A. (2017). The ideological orientation of Twitter messages posted during the 24M in Spain. Palabra Clave, 20(1), 213- 238. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.1.10
Scherpereel, J. A., Wohlgemuth, J., & Schmelzinger, M. (2017). The adoption and use of Twitter as a representational tool among members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society, 18(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125
Selva-Ruiz, D., & Caro-Castaño, L. (2017). Uso de Instagram como medio de comunicación política por parte de los diputados españoles: la estrategia de humanización en la “vieja” y la “nueva” política. El Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 903-915. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.12
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209
Skoric, M. M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Online social capital and participation in Asia-Pacific. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(5), 427-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2011.602270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2011.602270
Small, T. A. (2011). What is the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/50.4.111
Stromer-Galley, J., & Foot, K. A. (2002). Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00161.x
Stromer-Galley, J., & Foot, K. A. (2006). Citizen Perceptions of Online Interactivity and Implications for Political Campaign Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00161.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00161.x
Suau-Gomila, G., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Pedraza-Jiménez, R. (2020). Politicians or influencers? Twitter profiles of Pablo Iglesias and Albert Rivera in the Spanish general elections of 20-D and 26-J. Communication & Society, 33(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.209-225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.209-225
Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365020223902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202239025
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2016). A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens' uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007-1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259
Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2012). New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. Journal of Political Marketing, 11, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2012.642748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023
Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580
Warnick, B., Xenos, M., Endres, D., & Gastil, J. (2005). Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00253.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00253.x
Woods, H. S., & Hahner, L. A. (2019). Make America Meme Again: The Rhetoric of the Alt-Right. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b14436
Zamora-Medina, R. (2023). Politainment as dance: visual storytelling on TikTok among Spanish political parties. In D. Lilleker & A. Veneti, Research Handbook on Visual Politics (pp. 228-243). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376939.00025
Artículos relacionados
Adda, F. (2025). Practicar la verdad sin violencia: diálogo con Nietzsche. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1316
Montiel, L. I. T. (2024). Técnicas persuasivas empleadas en la comunicación política en la ciudad de Pilar, año 2024. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(5), 5353-5365. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i5.13976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i5.13976
Moreno Cabanillas, A., & Castillero Ostio, E. (2023). Comunicación política y redes sociales: análisis de la comunicación en Instagram de la campaña electoral del 13F. Vivat Academia, 156, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2023.156.e1461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2023.156.e1461
Nicasio Varea, B., Pérez Gabaldón, M., & Chávez, M. (2023). Estrategias de Comunicación divergentes: entre el rigor y la manipulación. Análisis comparativo de la Comunicación Política de Estados Unidos y España frente a la etapa inicial de la crisis del COVID-19. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 275-296. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1899
Posligua Quinde, I., & Ramírez Rodríguez, M. (2024). Comunicación política y redes sociales. La influencia en la opinión pública de la comunidad TikTok. Ñawi: arte diseño comunicación, 8(1), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v8n1.a15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37785/nw.v8n1.a15